Published on in Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Jan-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/39428, first published .
Comparing Pre- to Post-COVID-19 Health Disparities Between Black and White Female Connecticut Medicaid Beneficiaries in Behavioral Health Utilization

Comparing Pre- to Post-COVID-19 Health Disparities Between Black and White Female Connecticut Medicaid Beneficiaries in Behavioral Health Utilization

Comparing Pre- to Post-COVID-19 Health Disparities Between Black and White Female Connecticut Medicaid Beneficiaries in Behavioral Health Utilization

Abstract

1University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Hartford, CT, United States

2University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, United States

Corresponding Author:

Emil Coman, PhD, PStat

University of Connecticut School of Medicine

241 Main Street, 5th floor

Hartford, CT, 06106

United States

Phone: 1 18606796219

Fax:1 18606792670

Email: COMAN@uchc.edu


Background: Broad health disparities (HDs) persist in Connecticut and the United States between minority and White patients, especially in access to and the utilization of behavioral telehealth services.

Objective: We aimed to determine the geographic distribution of HDs in Connecticut between Black female and White female adults in Medicaid behavioral telehealth utilization in 2019 and 2020.

Methods: We used the following spatial Connecticut data: (1) behavioral health utilization from Medicaid claims, from the Connecticut Department of Social Services, for the third quarters of 2019 and 2020; (2) mental health and drug and alcohol treatment facilities and ZCTA (ZIP Code Tabulation Area)-level descriptors from PolicyMap; and (3) Connecticut ZIP-to-ZCTA crosswalk data. Data were joined spatially, merged, and analyzed using spatial autoregressive models in Stata 17 (with outcome, predictors, and errors spatial lags). We computed ZCTA-level HDs comparing Black and White adult female Medicaid beneficiaries’ rates of face-to-face and telehealth behavioral services utilization. Spatial regressions were used to test spatial effects, which are extensions of classic regressions, that add neighbors’ effects to covariates.

Results: Distances to nearest treatment facility vary quite widely in Connecticut by ZCTAs, from 0.06 mile to 13.4 miles—3.5 miles on average. The overall White female versus Black female HDs in behavioral health care utilization were impacted by the distance to the nearest facility, such that ZCTAs farther away from the nearest facility display larger Black versus White HDs—nearly statistically significant effect in 2019 and significant effect in 2020. In 2020, in ZCTAs situated farther away from treatment facilities, both White female and Black female Medicaid patients had higher telebehavioral health utilization (spatial effects +1.3% points and +2.0% points, respectively, for 1 more mile farther away). The differential Black versus White female HDs in telebehavioral health care utilization were not impacted by distance to nearest facility, according to the total effect (direct and indirect through neighboring ZCTAs; P=.26).

Conclusions: Quantitative analyses indicate broad differences in Medicaid enrollment and the utilization of behavioral health services among Black and White female Medicaid recipients in Connecticut and that these differences were rather stable between 2019 and 2020. It appears that the expansion of telebehavioral health services in 2020 enhanced the access to treatment among residents who were located furthest away from providing facilities.

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

iproc 2022;8(1):e39428

doi:10.2196/39428

Keywords


Edited by S Pagoto; This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 09.05.22; accepted 25.06.22; published 06.07.22

Copyright

©Emil Coman, Thomas Agresta, Willie Frazier, Wizdom Powell. Originally published in Iproceedings (https://www.iproc.org), 06.07.2022.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in Iproceedings, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.iproc.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.